Many others express their sob stories about how they can not return to the complex to visit family or friends even after they have "turned their life around".
Quoted from a ban supporter, "'When you get the rotten apples out of the projects, you make it a better place to live,' said Ray Maldonado, 28, a high school baseball coach who has lived in the Wald Houses in Manhattan all his life. 'When I was growing up here, there were so many opportunities to do the wrong thing. I've always said you got to make choices, and whether it's a good one or a bad one, you suffer the repercussions.'"
Maldonado poses an interesting point. How does one go about cleaning up the projects? How does a housing authority keeps it's "good" tenants safe?
My thoughts on this situation are...
- These people knew the rules and chose to break them.
- A little public humiliation just may make families deal with their problems instead of having the courts and/or jails do it for them.
- The article points out that the Housing Authority rules lets a banned person apply for an exclusion lift ''any time a substantial change has occurred". SO... stop whining, get your life together, and be an adult!
1 comment:
This is public information, so I guess they have the right to ask tenants about there past discrepancies. However, taking the "bad apples" out of the projects seems a little counter-intuitive. If you take them out of the projects, where will they go? I guess homelessness is not as important as keeping the projects clear of past offenders.
Post a Comment